经典传奇原创文学网 - 纯净的绿色文学家园 !

经典传奇(全文在线阅读>

经典传奇

习近平同约旦国王阿卜杜拉二世会谈_我的网站

银

一 |     中新社北京8月24日电 8月24日下午,中国国家主席习近平在北京人民大会堂同来华进行国事访问的约旦国王阿卜杜拉二世举行会谈。           习近平指出,中约建交以来,始终相互尊重、平等相待、互利合作,是不同社会制度、不同大小国家合作共赢、交流互鉴的生动写照。    

China's Ministry of Justice Photo: VCG
China's Ministry of Justice Photo: VCG
China on Wednesday determined that the EU's cross-border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its probe into JD.com under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction, and said it is barring organizations and individuals from implementing or assisting with the measures.
This statement was made by China's Ministry of Justice (MOJ), together with the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and other relevant departments. The announcement takes effect immediately.
The finding follows an investigation conducted pursuant to Articles 3 and 6 of China's rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures. No organization or individual may implement or assist in implementing such measures, according to the official WeChat account of the MOJ on Wednesday evening. 
The announcement sends a clear and firm message about China's position on the EU's unilateral measures, and the bloc should carefully weigh the broader implications of pursuing such actions, including the potential costs to its own interests and China-EU economic and trade relations, a Chinese expert said. Continued use of the FSR in this manner could erode investment confidence and further strain bilateral economic ties, the expert noted.
Countering extraterritorial overreach
A spokesperson for China's MOJ on Wednesday blasted the EU's targeting of JD.com, saying the bloc had arbitrarily demanded extensive and unnecessary information located in China from Chinese entities on a cross-border basis. Such demands are improper and constitute a serious violation of the international rule of law, the spokesperson said.
To safeguard China's sovereignty, security and development interests, as well as the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens, legal persons and other organizations, the Ministry of Justice, together with the Ministry of Commerce and other relevant authorities, determined in accordance with rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures that the EU's actions constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. Any organization or individual is therefore prohibited from complying with or assisting in the implementation of the measures, according to the spokesperson.
The MOJ spokesperson urged the EU to immediately correct its wrongful practices, stop abusing the Foreign Subsidies Regulation as an investigative tool, and provide a fair, just and predictable market environment for companies investing and operating in Europe. If the EU persists with such actions, China will take resolute countermeasures in accordance with law, the spokesperson said.
Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com's $2.5 billion bid for German electronics retailer Ceconomy may involve Chinese subsidies, European ‌Union competition regulators claimed, as they opened a full-scale investigation into the deal, Reuters reported on May 28.
The acquisition will allow one of China's largest retailers to expand outside its home market via Ceconomy-owned electronic products retailers MediaMarkt and Saturn, Reuters reported.
The decision by ⁠the European Commission marks its first in-depth probe of a Chinese deal under its so-called FSR.
This marks another time the rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures have been invoked since they took effect in April.
In May, the MOJ, together with MOFCOM and other relevant departments, determined after an investigation that the EU's cross border investigative practices targeting Chinese entities in its investigation into Nuctech under the FSR constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction.
The latest announcement concerning the EU's unilateral move under the FSR once again reflects the Chinese government's firm position on safeguarding national sovereignty, security and legitimate rights and interests, while also representing a clear response to the EU's relevant practices, Jian Junbo, director of the Center for China-Europe Relations at Fudan University's Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
"The announcement sends a clear signal to the EU and other countries: China will not accept attempts by any country to use its domestic laws as a basis for exercising unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction over matters within China, particularly when such actions undermine China's sovereign rights and interests," said Jian.
Likewise, China will not accept attempts to unilaterally address economic and trade frictions through so-called legal instruments when doing so harms the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies and the Chinese market, Jian said.
Call on fair, just market
The EU's frequent use of the FSR against Chinese companies is not an isolated occurrence.
In February, the European Commission announced an in-depth investigation under the FSR into Chinese wind turbine manufacturer Goldwind.
Responding to the bloc's move, a MOFCOM spokesperson said that the EU had recently frequently used the FSR to launch investigations into Chinese companies and had escalated investigations into Chinese wind power and security equipment companies to in-depth probes, showing clear targeting and discrimination. China has expressed serious concern and strong dissatisfaction over the moves.
The MOFCOM spokesperson said the EU's investigations had broadened the concept of "foreign subsidies" and involved multiple problems, including insufficient evidence to launch investigations and a lack of transparency in procedures, describing the practices as "typical protectionism in the name of 'fair competition.'"
In January 2025, following an investigation, MOFCOM already determined in accordance with the law that the EU's relevant practices constituted trade and investment barriers. Instead of correcting its practices, the EU has gone further down the wrong path.
"China has made its position very clear, and the EU should fully consider the consequences of continuing with such measures, including their potential impact on the EU itself and on China-EU economic and trade relations," Zhang Jian, a vice president of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, told the Global Times on Wednesday.
If the EU continues to impose excessive restrictions on foreign companies through similar rules, it will not only raise compliance costs for multinational companies but could also undermine the competitiveness of European businesses, Zhang said, noting that the EU economy is already facing considerable challenges, while concerns over excessive regulation, bureaucracy and increasingly complex rules have also grown within Europe.
Moreover, such rules may ultimately constrain European companies as well as foreign businesses, experts noted. At a time when the EU economy is facing difficulties, adding more regulation and restrictions instead of addressing underlying problems would be akin to "drinking poison to quench thirst," potentially creating even greater problems for the European economy, Zhang said.
China and the EU are both major global economies. Chinese investment in Europe not only brings capital, but also creates jobs, strengthens supply chains, introduces new technologies and adds vitality to local markets, Jian said.
Moreover, from new-energy vehicles to air conditioners and other consumer products, Chinese companies have brought high-quality, cost-effective products to European consumers, helping meet much-needed market demand while providing consumers with greater choice.
Jian said that as China-EU cross border investment deepens, regulatory frictions are inevitable, but they should be addressed through dialogue and coordination rather than unilateral expansion of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Respect for each other's judicial sovereignty and legal boundaries is essential to stable and predictable economic and trade ties, the expert said.
。2015年,我们共同宣布建立中约战略伙伴关系,开启双边关系发展新篇章。面对变乱交织的国际和地区形势,建设更具内涵、更有活力的中约关系符合两国人民共同期待,也顺应全球南方联合自强的大势。

二 | 双方要弘扬传统友好,增进战略互信,深化互利合作,密切多边协作,推动中约战略伙伴关系得到更大发展,不断为地区和平、稳定、繁荣作出积极贡献。           习近平强调,中方重视约旦在地区的独特和重要作用,坚定支持约旦维护国家主权、安全、发展利益,愿同约方密切政府、政党、立法机构、地方等各层级交往,加强治国理政经验交流。

三 | 中约合作本质是互利共赢,双方要进一步深化发展战略对接,加强经贸、基础设施建设、交通、矿产等传统领域合作,拓展数字经济、人工智能、绿色能源等新合作增长点,全方位深化教育、文化、科技、旅游等交流,扩大人员往来,增进民心相通。中方愿同约方一道践行四大全球倡议,加强在联合国等多边机构协调和配合,共同维护以联合国为核心的国际体系和以国际法为基础的国际秩序,推动构建人类命运共同体。

四 |            阿卜杜拉二世表示,中国是一个伟大的国家,在习近平主席领导下取得巨大发展成就,令人钦佩。

五 | 约旦和中国建立了强有力的战略伙伴关系,双方始终相互尊重、密切协作,各领域合作取得丰硕成果。约方坚定奉行一个中国政策,认为台湾是中国领土的组成部分。约旦高度重视对华关系,致力于同中国深化经贸、制造、农业、科技、医药、文化、教育等领域合作交流,欢迎更多中国企业赴约旦投资,实现共同发展繁荣。

六 | 约方高度评价习近平主席提出的四大全球倡议,期待中国在世界舞台上发挥更重要的领导作用。           两国元首就中东地区局势交换了意见。

七 | 习近平强调,中方一贯主张全面停火止战,通过政治外交途径化解争端,认为包括约旦在内地区国家的主权和安全应当得到尊重。巴勒斯坦问题是中东问题的核心,推动解决这一问题应坚持4点原则:一是必须坚持政治解决,锚定“两国方案”这一正确方向,推动巴以重启和谈,实现巴勒斯坦早日独立建国;二是必须坚持“巴人治巴”,巴勒斯坦是所有巴勒斯坦人的家园,应秉持“巴人治巴”原则推进约旦河西岸治理和加沙战后重建;三是必须坚持人道主义,国际社会特别是联合国安理会应该切实负起责任,保护平民安全,确保人道主义援助,制止人道主义灾难;四是必须坚持公平正义,以国际法治为基础,以标本兼治为目标,以务实行动为路径,推动巴勒斯坦问题早日实现全面、公正、持久解决。           阿卜杜拉二世表示,约方高度赞赏中方在中东事务中一直秉持公正立场,支持阿拉伯国家正义事业,中方的正义立场对地区国家非常重要。约方愿同中方保持密切沟通,继续为缓和当前局势作出积极努力,让中东各国人民安享和平与繁荣。

八 |            会谈后,两国元首共同见证签署外交、经贸、产供链、司法等领域多项合作文件。           双方发表《中华人民共和国和约旦哈希姆王国关于深化中约战略伙伴关系的联合声明》。           会谈前,习近平在人民大会堂北大厅为阿卜杜拉二世举行欢迎仪式。           阿卜杜拉二世抵达时,礼兵列队致敬。

九 | 两国元首登上检阅台,军乐团奏中约两国国歌,天安门广场鸣放礼炮21响。阿卜杜拉二世在习近平陪同下检阅中国人民解放军仪仗队,并观看分列式。           当晚,习近平在人民大会堂金色大厅为阿卜杜拉二世举行欢迎宴会。

十 |            王毅参加上述活动。

十一 | (完) 【编辑:张子怡】。

Current article:http://6usf.suilaoheirenzhaizhaikang.sbs/fcmen7l/jx6lb.html

Published on:16:36:04


顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
------分隔线----------------------------